These are all the Blogs posted today: Friday, 18, 2008.
VA foreclosure contract Ocwen ends July 24th what's next?
34 recommendation(s).
+Recommend this blog I have been advised by an agent for Ocwen that they did not even bid on renewing contract. No problem there but who did get the contract!
Read more | 0 comments
VETVOICE AND ABC NEWS REPORT ON MCCAIN'S HISTORY OF BEING WRONG ON AFGHANISTAN
John McCain's 'character' and me and the Little Engine that Could.
64 recommendation(s).
+Recommend this blog "I think I can. I think I can."
Nope. It turns out, I can't. Unless, and until, folks define their terms, I really can’t know with any level of certainty what they’re really saying, or what they’re really trying to accomplish. Take the word “character” for example. On C-SPAN’s Washington Journal viewer morning call-in program, I’ve heard many McCain vocalize the senator’s “character” as a foundation for their support. Recently I submitted evidence (with URL, his own book, and court records attributions) of his lifetime of philandering, of cheating on his first spouse, cheating John McCain does not deny, and of his flat-out lying concerning the when and the circumstances in which his cheating occurred. Regardless, significant portions of the electorate continue to tout the Arizona senator’s “moral character,” and I’m bewildered just how low the bar must be for these people, or perhaps, how extraordinarily resilient must their racial bigotry be, for them to call on “character” as a source of their political position. (Senator Obama is sufficiently vulnerable on any number of issues that it would seem endorsing his opponent on the issue of moral character would be wholly unnecessary.) Let the record show that Senator John McCain is a rank panderer and contortionist of the first rank. To wit I offer the following in evidence. By the speech Senator McCain delivered at the NAACP convention this week in Cincinnati one might be fooled into believing John McCain marched hand in hand with Martin Luther King, and that no minority ever had a more out-front, stalwart ally than him. Follows is the link to the full test of his speech. (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/16/us/politics/16text-mccain.html?_r=1&oref=slogin) But then, what about how John McCain twice voted against civil rights legislation? ([1990 Senate Vote #276, 10/16/1990; 1990 Senate Vote #304, 10/24/1990; 1990 CQ Almanac, p. 60-S]) Or, how John McCain voted against Martin Luther King Jr. Holiday? ([Vote 289, HR 3706, Motion agreed to 89-77, D 249-13, 8/2/83; CQ 1983]) When I recall how, during his 2000 campaign for the presidency, McCain called the country’s most prevalent far-Right evangelical personalities “agents of intolerance," and then of a sudden how, this time around, he couldn’t hug them closer to his bosom, and when I cull the gathering tide of increasing evidence of his convenient position reversals, will anyone suggest I am somehow so terribly biased I cannot locate in the man the true strength of moral character that is there? When I recall how, in a Baton Rouge town hall meeting this year, Senator McCain expounded on how he had been extremely concerned for the plight of the citizens of Louisiana, as Katrina was bearing down, this White House photograph (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/08/images/20050829-5_p082905pm-0125-515h.html), taken during the storm's onslaught of New Orleans, tells a rather different tale, I am forced once again to ask, am I so terribly biased . . . ? If only I could try harder. (Or, if only Senator McCain could learn — at least for a little while — to tell the truth.) — Ed Tubbs Thousand Oaks, CA PS — Of course I welcome responses, those that disagree as well as those that agree. But I’ve got to insist that only those retaining the courage of their convictions to include their real name and the city where they reside, exactly as they would for any letter to the editor, will be read or responded to. Now is the time for all of us to live up to the words and sentiments in our National Anthem. Follows are the senate.gov records, evidence that McCain has voted against EVERY active or veteran benefit bill since 2000; that from a senator who has missed more votes (59.2%) than any other. September, 2007, McCain voted against the Webb amendment that would have provided all troops in Iraq have at least as much time home and in training as in theater. (S.Amdt 2909, 2910, 2910; 9/19/2007, 5:30 pm) http://senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00341
May, 2006, voted against an amendment that would have provided the VA with an additional $20 million for healthcare facilities. (S.Amdt 3704; 5/4/2006, 11:34 am) http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00111
April, 2006, McCain was one of 13 Republicans to vote against $430 million for VA outpatient care and facilities. (S.Amdt 3642; 4/26/2006, 5:55 pm) http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00098 March, 2006, McCain voted against increasing VA medical services funding. (S.Amdt 3007 to S.Con.Res 83; 3/14/2006, 4:22 pm) http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00041 March, 2004, McCain voted against establishing a VA reserve fund to treat veterans. (S.Amdt 2745 to S.Con.Res 95; 3/10/2004, 9:34 pm) http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=108&session=2&vote=00040
October, 2003, McCain voted to table an amendment by Senator Dodd (D-CN) that called for an additional $322 million in safety equipment for soldiers in Iraq. (S.Amdt. 1817 to S. 1689; 10/2/2003, 7:36 pm) http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=108&session=1&vote=00376
April, 2003, McCain voted to table a senate vote to provide more than $1 billion for National Guard and Reserve equipment in Iraq. (S.Amdt 452 to S. 762; 4/2/2003, 5:35 pm) http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=108&session=1&vote=00116
August, 2001, McCain voted against increasing the amount available for medical care for veterans by $650 million. (S.Amdt. 1218 to S.Amdt. 1214; 8/1/2001, 6:02 pm) http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=1&vote=00263
Read more | 0 comments
Dept. of Peace Bill gets bipartisan help- NAM VET REACHES ACROSS THE AISLE
34 recommendation(s).
+Recommend this blog Dept. of Peace Bill gets bipartisan help NewsBlaze.com- July 16, 2008 The establishment of a Department of Peace would surely raise awareness of the reality that the promotion and negotiation of peace and nonviolent conflict resolution is an essential art of international and domestic relations. However, I’m not sure how the yin-yang of a Secretary of Peace and a Secretary of War (let’s be honest about it) relationship would work out. And what message would it send if the SecState were dispatched to tackle the issue of an overseas conflict ahead of the SecPeace or vice versa? Internationally, the Department will research and analyze foreign policy and recommend to the President ways to address the root causes of war. The Department will also provide expert advice to the President on nonviolent means of diffusing or dealing with international crises. Hmm. If a president like Bush didn’t heed military advice from Colin Powell… Apparently this idea has been floated under the assumption that future presidents will be open to accepting the wise consul of experts whose specialties lay outside the realm of spin. Though the concept of a Department of Peace is a noble and righteous one and I applaud the efforts of these 70 corageous lawmakers, especially Rep. Wayne Gilchrest, for subjecting themselves to the inevitible cycle of ridicule, I’m willing to speculate that this dove’s not gonna fly. A more realistic approach might involve the launching of ideas like a federal Peace Academy and other initiatives to strengthen our peacemaking infrastructure at home and abroad without the creation of an additional bureaucracy controlled by the executive branch. Read more | 0 comments
IT'S GONNA BE A BLOODBATH: FALLEN SOLDIER TOLD DAD--CNN REPORTS
MIXED SIGNALS: TOP IRAQI GEN. TELLS NY TIMES HE LIKES OBAMA, BUT NOT TROOP PLAN
|
View other days blogs
Most popular bloggers
The Latest Posts!
29-Aug-2008
My Sarah Palin mother of all nightmares 29-Aug-2008 VP candidate Sarah Palin, in vogue, and in a nightgown on the cover of Vogue 29-Aug-2008 GENERATION KILL Commands Iraq War Genre to “Stay Frosty”-- PT 2 of 2 29-Aug-2008 GENERATION KILL Commands Iraq War Genre to “Stay Frosty” 29-Aug-2008 ARMY'S SUICIDE RATE HITS NEW HIGH---DENVER POST 28-Aug-2008 EMERGENCY ACTION REQUIRED: New McCain ad reeks of fetid beyond anything Rovian Most Recommended Posts
27-Aug-2008
The ONLY ones who will vote for John McCain 28-Aug-2008 Conservatives vs Liberals 28-Aug-2008 EMERGENCY ACTION REQUIRED: New McCain ad reeks of fetid beyond anything Rovian 27-Aug-2008 Why I'm a Democrat 28-Aug-2008 A conversation with a ghost. Archives
2008
August July June May April March February January 2007 December November October September August July June May April March 2006 February January 2005 December November October September August July March January 2004 December November October Bookmarks
wounded Times
Paratrooper Prayers
Veterans Prayers
Exotic Warfare against Vets and US citizens
Chemtrails are this
Truth
My Campaign Homepage
Doug Denneny Web Blog
Screaming In An Empty Room
Wounded Times
Rodney J Owen Blog
Lawrence A. Kelley III
You Served
OpEdNews
Women in Combat
Tribute to the M1 Garand
Tribute to the Army's Truck Driver
Sgt Scorpion's misadventures in Iraq
OEF Vets Resource
Fast Cash Online
Iraq War Veteran Resources
Iraq from the Window
Desert Veterans
Search
Looking for something specific?
Try a simple search of the key word.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



