Army Times Editorial Calls for Improvements at VBA

Veterans for Common Sense (VCS) was formed in August 2002 as a nonprofit 501(c)3 organization by war veterans who believe that we, the people of the United States of America, are most secure when our country is free, strong, and responsibly engaged with the world. Our mission, based on the pragmatic ideals of the American patriot Thomas Paine, is to raise the unique and powerful voices of veterans so that our military, veterans, freedom, and national security are protected and enhanced, for ourselves and for future generations.

"We owe a debt to all who served and when we repay that debt to those bravest Americans among us, then we are investing in our future."
~ Barack Obama, August 3, 2009

What's New

VCS Adds "VCS on TV" News Clips to Web Site

Television News Coverage of VCS Advocacy

VCS now posts links to television news broadcasts featuring Veterans for Common Sense and our highly successful advocacy efforts on issues you care about.

Disabled Iraq War Veteran with Service Dog Beaten by McDonalds Employee

October 30, 2009, Brooklyn, New York (Courthouse News Service) - A disabled Army captain who was wounded in Iraq claims McDonald's employees beat him with garbage can lids after he brought his service dog to the restaurant. Luis Montalvan says the attack came as he was photographing the restaurant after he repeatedly complained about the treatment he received there.

Deployment at All Costs: Military Arrests Mom, Sends Child to Protective Serivces

Soldier mom refuses deployment to care for baby

November 16, 2009, Savannah, Georgia (Associated Press) – An Army cook and single mom may face criminal charges after she skipped her deployment flight to Afghanistan because, she said, no one was available to care for her infant son while she was overseas.

Fort Hood Fallout: Camp Lejeune Whistle-Blower Fired

A psychiatrist who tried to prevent Fort Hood-style violence among Marines about to "lose it" instead loses his job

November 16, 2009 (Salon) - Last April, two Marines at Camp Lejeune predicted to a psychiatrist that some Marine back from war was going to "lose it." Concerned, the psychiatrist asked what that meant. One of the Marines responded, "One of these guys is liable to come back with a loaded weapon and open fire."

New York Times Profiles VA and Secretary Shinseki

No Longer a Soldier, Shinseki Has a New Mission

November 11, 2009 (New York Times) - It was a sad homecoming of sorts. On Tuesday, Eric Shinseki, the secretary of veterans affairs, returned to Fort Hood, Tex., where he was a division commander in the mid-1990s, to pay tribute to two veterans affairs employees who died in the shootings there last week.

Main Menu

Army Times Editorial Calls for Improvements at VBA

Written by Army Times

Friday, 30 October 2009 09:00

VA Needs Bold Change

November 2, 2009 (Army Times Editorial Board) – When it comes to the vast and stubborn backlog of veterans benefits claims, Congress seems all too content to make a flyswatter to an elephant.

Among a pile of pending veterans-related bills is a proposal to require the Veterans Affairs Department to notify veterans when a claim is received.

VA already notifies veterans who file electronic claims; this proposal would only duplicate that for claims filed by mail.

It would do nothing to reduce the backlog and, in fact, it could worsen the process y forcing VA staffers to prepare and send out snail-mail noticies for claims that are not received electronically.

That’s not helpful.

The claims backlog is 453,000 and growing. It takes an average of four to five months for VA to make an initial ruling. Appeals can drag out for years

And even though VA has hired more claims processors, new claims among veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are pouring in at a rate of 80,000 per month, a 10 percent jump over last year’s pace. VA can’t keep up.

That’s why more expansive ideas for attacking the backlog are needed. One proposal – automatically approving claims from combat veterans and then using spot audits to monitor for fraud – has languished for years. Because most combat veterans’ claims are ultimately approved, the risk of fraud would be relatively low.

At a minimum, however, Congress should mandate deadlines for decisions – guaranteeing an initial ruling in, say, 60 days, and a ruling on an appeal within 180 days.

Even if VA could not meet those deadlines, the requirement would at least provide hard data on how many more claims processors may be needed to meet the requirement – something VA seems incapable of figuring out today.